Among many current debate, but without the hope that would change regulations and European regulation, the Judges of the Supreme Court recently (Decision No. 45643 of 11/20/2009) have established that the tax offenses under Leg . 74/2000 be considered as predicate offenses for the purpose of money laundering legislation.
What ?????????
means that professionals (along with the other parties responsible) addressed money laundering legislation where you bought. 231/2007 are required to report Naturally relevant conditions are met, the conduct of criminal law clients that intergovernmental provisions relating to tax offenses .
Nanno Judges of the Supreme Court ruled that "... the crime of money laundering can be assumed as the main offense crimes not only functionally oriented to the creation of capital offenses, including bribery, extortion, corporate crimes, bankruptcy crimes, but also crimes, according to the vision that more rigorous and traditional reception of the phenomenon, there were strangers, such as tax offenses. .. "
What ?????????
means that professionals (along with the other parties responsible) addressed money laundering legislation where you bought. 231/2007 are required to report Naturally relevant conditions are met, the conduct of criminal law clients that intergovernmental provisions relating to tax offenses .
Nanno Judges of the Supreme Court ruled that "... the crime of money laundering can be assumed as the main offense crimes not only functionally oriented to the creation of capital offenses, including bribery, extortion, corporate crimes, bankruptcy crimes, but also crimes, according to the vision that more rigorous and traditional reception of the phenomenon, there were strangers, such as tax offenses. .. "
So great ideas reflection on themes introduced by the recent verdict.
0 comments:
Post a Comment